Tanya pakar: 6 Formula Kerjaya Impian
Submitted to : Airil Haimi Mohd Adnan, tutor.
In partial requirement for BEL313,
Introduction to Critical Thinking.
Test #2, semester 1 2013/2014,
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seri Iskandar Campus, Perak Darul Ridzuan.
Submitted by : Ili Syazwani binti Ahmad Fuad, 2011256858.
After I
read the whole thing, I found that the article is really informative to the
readers. Reading this article is a must for every university students and high
school students as a preparation for the working world. The author is really
smart and up-to-date as he wrote the article about the current issue in
Malaysia. Nowadays, many graduates are failed to find jobs because of the
competitions among them. Even though the article is good, but there are a few
fallacies that can be found.
The first one is appeal to ignorance from the statement “Statistik menunjukkan sesetengah ‘kerjaya impian’ tinggal impian semata-mata kerana terlalu ramai yang berminat dengan kerjaya itu”. The author should provides a proof about the statistic given in the article so that it can strongly support the statement. The statement “Graduan mestilah memperoleh Nilai Purata Gred Keseluruhan-PNGK (CGPA) tidak kurang daripada 3.00 dan 3.50 ke atas untuk memohon pekerjaan di firma antarabangsa” shows the use of hasty generalization. The employers think that the higher the pointer, the more capable the graduate to do the job in the future.
The point is, the pointers are not the yardstick to measure the capabilities of the graduates. Last but not least, from the statement “Graduan yang membuat pelaburan tambahan dengan belajar sewaktu cuti semester contohnya, mudah mendapat pekerjaan dengan sijil tambahan yang mereka miliki”, it is clearly begging the question. According to the author, the graduates are easier to get jobs if they have additional certificates and experiences.
The first one is appeal to ignorance from the statement “Statistik menunjukkan sesetengah ‘kerjaya impian’ tinggal impian semata-mata kerana terlalu ramai yang berminat dengan kerjaya itu”. The author should provides a proof about the statistic given in the article so that it can strongly support the statement. The statement “Graduan mestilah memperoleh Nilai Purata Gred Keseluruhan-PNGK (CGPA) tidak kurang daripada 3.00 dan 3.50 ke atas untuk memohon pekerjaan di firma antarabangsa” shows the use of hasty generalization. The employers think that the higher the pointer, the more capable the graduate to do the job in the future.
The point is, the pointers are not the yardstick to measure the capabilities of the graduates. Last but not least, from the statement “Graduan yang membuat pelaburan tambahan dengan belajar sewaktu cuti semester contohnya, mudah mendapat pekerjaan dengan sijil tambahan yang mereka miliki”, it is clearly begging the question. According to the author, the graduates are easier to get jobs if they have additional certificates and experiences.
(250 words)
by : Ili syazwani
No comments:
Post a Comment